![]() If I'm reading this correctly, then it sounds like you're saying "if you beta tested the game on whatever platform, you get the beta-testing skin," and that's. No, it should only be given on consoles that had the game at around that time. I’ve paid 50$ for exclusive skins that eventually were just given to everyone free anyway… but- What your saying here makes no sense. and because my inventory can now be shared across accounts just link my Mobile/Xs version (released about 2-3 years from the moment of this post) and I’ll have the skin from being in Beta of the game when it launches on a new platform? So what your saying is- if Klei did this like right now this second and gave like a 2-3 week grace period for the platform if I missed the date to get the skin on PC/ then Ps4 later and a year later on Xbox- I could go out right now and buy the game on Nintendo Switch and since it’s in the “grace” period of owning it when it first launches I will get the skin awarded to me on my Switch, And if I happen to miss that- a few years from now When/If DST is rereleased on Mobile Smartphones or PS5/XS I can just buy the game during THAT Grace period and be awarded the skin. I believe that it would be possible for them to just look up on dates when people bought the game and distribute it. It is not about gatekeeping skins, it is about gatekeeping one skin that was given for a very special reason to players that bought the game at that What klei should've done is give the skin to all the players that bought DST at that time on consoles. It was a simple skin in the game that should've stayed exclusive, it is not a collection as it was given as early access award and it was said that it was given for that. It doesn't make any sense to have rarities that don't have any differences in the game. Rarities have no value, its only a word that says timeless or loyal in your curio, not like you even look at that yourself and other players would care even less for it. Would DST continue developing to this day if it didn't get the initial support or any other games in EA for that matter? How can you even use the argument that you haven't been there? That's the whole point. because chances are I’ll never get to crossplay with switch players anyway. ![]() I wouldn’t care at all if DST had Switch exclusive skins. & finally if you play Minecraft on Nintendo consoles- You can have an exclusive Mario themed Mashup skin/Texture pack. If you’ve ever played Minecraft on Xbox you’d know it has Halo & State of Decay exclusive skins/Mashup packs, If you played on PlayStation- You got A Spider-Man skin set that was once actually available on Xbox but when Sony bought the rights to the franchise (yes Spider-Man franchise is owned by Sony.) The skin set that was on Xbox was removed & now it’s exclusive to playing on PlayStation. Quick question, if Console players are never ever ever going to be able to play Crossplatform with PC- What does it matter if console players can finally get a skin they could’ve only gotten if they had been playing on PC in a Early Access Beta?Īnother Question- If Nintendo Switch got console exclusive Nintendo Licensed skins (Mario, Donkey Kong Etc.) Would people on Xbox/PlayStation/PC be angry that they can’t use that consoles exclusive skins?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |